SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 27 AUGUST 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
MDM
SWDM
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
Details
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 27 August 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 166
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 166
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case on Tuesday, 27 August 2013, involving MDM against SWDMLAUNCESTON. The matter was brought before Justice Wood in the criminal jurisdiction. The specifics of the dispute between the parties are not detailed in the excerpt, but it is evident that the case pertains to a criminal matter.
The legal issues before the court included the interpretation and application of relevant criminal law and procedure, as well as any procedural matters that needed to be addressed for the case's progression. The court was required to determine how to manage the case moving forward, which likely involved considering the evidence presented, the rights of the accused, and the obligations of the prosecution.
Justice Wood provided directions for the hearing, likely outlining the steps to be taken in the case's progression. The court's reasoning was focused on ensuring that the legal process was conducted fairly and efficiently, taking into account the rights of both parties and the principles of criminal justice. The outcome of the hearing was to set a clear path forward for the case, including any necessary procedural steps or evidentiary hearings.
The final orders of the court would have been communicated to the parties involved, directing them on how to proceed with the case. This would include any scheduling of further hearings, the exchange of evidence, and other procedural requirements necessary for the case's resolution.
The legal issues before the court included the interpretation and application of relevant criminal law and procedure, as well as any procedural matters that needed to be addressed for the case's progression. The court was required to determine how to manage the case moving forward, which likely involved considering the evidence presented, the rights of the accused, and the obligations of the prosecution.
Justice Wood provided directions for the hearing, likely outlining the steps to be taken in the case's progression. The court's reasoning was focused on ensuring that the legal process was conducted fairly and efficiently, taking into account the rights of both parties and the principles of criminal justice. The outcome of the hearing was to set a clear path forward for the case, including any necessary procedural steps or evidentiary hearings.
The final orders of the court would have been communicated to the parties involved, directing them on how to proceed with the case. This would include any scheduling of further hearings, the exchange of evidence, and other procedural requirements necessary for the case's resolution.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.