Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 May 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 26 MAY 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Kristin Lee Poole

For Mention
Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Jess Aaron Morgan

10:00 a.m.

For Hearing

Christopher Stephen Stanley
v
State of Tasmania

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Derek Michael Crosswell
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael Samuel Charlesworth

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Bradley Chaplin
v
Richard Lane

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Application
Benjamin Angus Shield
Brent Humphrey

For Directions Hearing via videolink to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Stuart Barry Russell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Shaun Kevin Sclater

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Discharge by video link to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Brodie Leigh Jones

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Stuart Barry Russell

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Discharge via video link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brodie Leigh Jones

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Tuesday, 26 May 2015, the Supreme Court of Tasmania had a series of criminal and civil matters scheduled for hearing. One of the criminal cases, Acting Director of Public Prosecutions v Kristin Lee Poole, was set for judgment at 9:45 a.m. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the summary, but it involved a decision on the criminal charges brought by the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions against Kristin Lee Poole. Another criminal case, Acting Director of Public Prosecutions v Jess Aaron Morgan, was scheduled for mention at 10:00 a.m. The legal issues in these cases likely pertained to the interpretation and application of criminal law, including the admissibility of evidence, the validity of charges, and potential defences.

The court was required to decide on the appropriate legal outcomes based on the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties. In cases such as these, the court would consider the seriousness of the alleged offences, the credibility of witnesses, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The judgments would be based on the principles of justice and fairness, ensuring that the rights of the accused are protected while also upholding the law.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's decisions in these cases would set a precedent for similar matters in the future. The outcome of each case would depend on the specific circumstances and the arguments presented by the prosecution and defence. The court's reasoning and decisions would be based on a thorough analysis of the law and the facts of the case.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 May 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established