Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 June 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 26 JUNE 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Luke David Buck

For Trial
Kurt Stanley James
Aaron James Crosswell
(Part heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
IPP

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Anthony Carr

4.15pm For Sentence
Robert Anthony Zizek

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a decision by the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a high court within the Australian state of Tasmania. The parties in this case are not explicitly named in the document, but the nature of the dispute appears to involve criminal and civil matters, as indicated by the listings for different court divisions. The court was required to address various legal issues related to the cases scheduled for mention, trial, or sentencing.

The legal issues the court was required to decide pertain to both criminal and civil cases. For the criminal cases, these issues likely involve the application of criminal law and procedure, including the handling of part-heard trials, sentencing, and other procedural matters. For the civil case, the court needed to address matters of miscellaneous civil business, which could include a variety of legal disputes such as contract disputes, property disputes, or personal injury claims. The specific legal issues in each case would have been determined by the nature of the allegations and the evidence presented.

The reasoning and outcome of the court's decision are not detailed in the document. However, it can be inferred that the court would have considered the evidence presented, applied relevant laws and legal principles, and made decisions based on the merits of each case. The outcomes would have varied depending on the specifics of each case, with possible outcomes including the continuation of trials, the imposition of sentences, or the resolution of civil disputes.

No final orders are explicitly stated in the document, but it is expected that the court would have issued orders in line with its decisions, such as the continuation of trials, the imposition of sentences, or the resolution of civil disputes. The court's decisions and orders would have been communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 June 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established