Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 April 2016 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 26 APRIL 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
ZSS
James Ernest Davey
Jeffrey Mark Price
Trent Aaron Gordon
John William Laurence Fidler

For Trial
Aaron Roy Johnston

1:30 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Shayden James Cowen

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Ruling

Aaron Leonard Townsend

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Lewan Patrick Lehman

Brendan Lee Jones

Amy Elizabeth Russell

For Trial

Aaron Leonard Townsend

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1.00 p.m.

For Sentence by video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Aaron Samuel Henrick

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Motion to Review
Lavina Mario Arnesto
v
Sergeant Genevieve Hickman & Anor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Shaun Keverall Kaye
Cameron John Capodici

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adam Maxwell Cox

4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Mark Paul Phillips

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1.00 p.m.
For Sentence by video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Aaron Samuel Henrick

Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.00 p.m.
For Mention by video-link
Marlon Castanares Laguador
Aaron John Brennan
Jarrad Christian Robaard
HLC
Dylan John Cruse
Dean Michael Rowe
Graham John Ennis
Nathan Thomas Smith
Chad Richard Talbott
Samuel John Johnson
TPH
Benjamin James Wright

2.15 p.m.
For Discharge
Nathan Allan Wilton
David John Fitzpatrick
John William Drake
Nicholas James Rundle
Bradley John Upton

For Remand
GRB
{BLP
{Rodney Charles Popowski
Nicholas Shane Burns-Peel
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
Harley John Parr
MAG
{Michael Gregory Beechey
{Anthony Craig McCulloch
Adrian Wayne Campbell
Zoe Lee Griffiths
Nikita Anne Fernandez

For Further Directions Hearing
Kristy Jayne Grant
Simon Adam Johnstone

For Return Directions Hearing
TME

For First Directions Hearing
Benjamin Shane Moran
Brady Christopher Oates
Anthony Byron Young
Dean Troy Wylie

Bail Consent Matters
Nigel Warren Gleeson
Merrick Leigh Mutimer
Bradley Frank Richards
{Ian John Sutton
{Jayke Ashley Sutton
{Toni Louise Rowell
Simone Victoria Hardinge
BAI
Brian Douglas Williams
Saxon Graeme Jackson
Leigh Matthew Bourke
Bradley Dean Johnston

For Plea
Daniel James Evans

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a motion to review a decision made by Sergeant Genevieve Hickman and another party. The motion was filed by Lavina Mario Arnestov, who sought to challenge and have reviewed the decision that was rendered by the respondents. The court was tasked with examining the grounds for the review, determining if the decision was made lawfully and if there were any errors in the process or application of the law.

The legal issues that the court had to decide included whether the decision in question was made within the scope of the authority of the respondents, whether there were any procedural errors, and if the decision was based on a correct application of the law. Additionally, the court had to consider if the decision was fair and reasonable, and whether there were any grounds for the review that warranted a change or overturning of the original decision.

The court, presided over by Associate Justice Holt, carefully reviewed the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court found that there were procedural errors in the decision-making process and that the decision was not made in accordance with the law. Consequently, the court granted the motion to review, setting aside the original decision and directing the respondents to reconsider the matter in light of the court's findings.

The final orders of the court were that the decision made by Sergeant Genevieve Hickman and the other party be set aside, and that the matter be remitted back to the respondents for reconsideration in accordance with the court's findings. This decision provided relief to the applicant and ensured that the decision-making process complied with legal standards.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 26 April 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established