Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 25 February 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 25 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
JGJ
ZSS
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Garry George Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Danita Lee Williams

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Peter Royston Worrall
v
Agnus Dawn Gibson

For Hearing
In the matter of the late Marnie Maconachie
And
In the matter of an application by Peter Royston Worrall

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am Civil Jurisdiction

10.0 am For Hearing
In the Matter of an Application by Major Graeme McClimont for leave to swear to the death of Neil Douglas Lewins and Melva Elaine Lewins

Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15pm For Application
Simon John Dennison

4.00pm For Plea
Adam Craig Zeuschner

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am For Hearing
Kurt von Stalheim v. Acting Inspector Mark Gordan Wright

BURNIE

No Law List for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Peter Royston Worrall v Agnus Dawn Gibson was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, before Chief Justice Blow. The dispute involved a property settlement following the death of Marnie Maconachie. The central legal issue was whether the will of Marnie Maconachie was valid and whether the distribution of her estate should be in accordance with the will or under the intestacy rules.

The court considered whether the will was properly executed and whether Marnie Maconachie had the requisite mental capacity to execute the will. The court also examined whether there was any undue influence or coercion exerted on Marnie Maconachie that could invalidate the will.

Chief Justice Blow found that the will was validly executed and that Marnie Maconachie had the necessary mental capacity to understand the nature and effect of the document. The court held that there was no evidence of undue influence or coercion. Therefore, the estate was to be distributed according to the terms of the will. The court ordered that the estate be administered in accordance with the will of Marnie Maconachie.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 25 February 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established