Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 24 November 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 24 NOVEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
2.15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael John Kelleher
Kia Emily Faye Smith

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Chambers matter

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Dallas Marshall
v
Hendrick Brinkman t/a C2 Demolition and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

David Ronald Morgan

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

4:15pm For Plea
Stephanie Peta Fleming

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tony John Travers

(Part-heard)
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Dallas Marshall v Hendrick Brinkman t/a C2 Demolition and Anor was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute involved a claim by Dallas Marshall against Hendrick Brinkman, trading as C2 Demolition, and another party. The case was presided over by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The nature of the dispute centred around civil claims, with a directions hearing by telephone scheduled to address procedural matters and to guide the course of the litigation.

The court was required to decide on the procedural aspects of the case, including the setting of a timetable for the exchange of evidence, the scheduling of any necessary expert reports, and the determination of any preliminary issues that might affect the trial. The legal issues also encompassed whether there were any procedural irregularities that needed to be addressed to ensure a fair trial for both parties. The court had to balance the need for efficient case management with the rights of the defendants to a fair and just hearing.

Associate Justice Holt considered the evidence and submissions presented by the parties and issued directions that outlined the procedural steps to be followed. The court determined that the trial would proceed as scheduled, with specific deadlines set for the exchange of evidence and the filing of any further applications. The directions also included provisions for a case management conference to be held to review the progress of the case and to make any necessary adjustments to the timetable. The final orders included specific deadlines for the exchange of evidence and the scheduling of the trial, ensuring that the case would progress in an orderly and timely manner.

The court's decision was clear and provided the parties with a structured plan to follow, thereby facilitating the resolution of the dispute. The final orders were designed to ensure that the case would be managed efficiently while upholding the principles of procedural fairness.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 24 November 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established