Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 2 July 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 2 JULY 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
9.30 a.m.
For Voir Dire
Stephen Roy Standage

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Mark Leigh Freeman
(Part-Heard)

To Follow
For Legal Argument
Phillip Mark Law

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Hearing
Paula Kate Heyward
v
Jai Moyle

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Directions Hearing
Felmingham
v
Fish

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Luke John Smith

4.00pm For Application to Vary Bail
Scott Thomas Clarke

For Bail Application
Shane Vivian Smith

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Paula Kate Heyward v Jai Moyle was heard by Justice Wood. The dispute involved issues related to a civil matter, with the hearing scheduled for 2.15 p.m. The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of specific matters arising from the civil case, which required judicial consideration and resolution. The court had to assess the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to arrive at a decision on the issues at hand.

Justice Wood examined the evidence and submissions thoroughly, applying relevant legal principles and precedents. The court's reasoning was grounded in a detailed analysis of the facts and applicable law. After careful consideration, Justice Wood delivered a decision that resolved the issues in favour of one party, providing a clear direction for the proceedings. The outcome was based on a balanced interpretation of the evidence and a meticulous application of legal standards.

The final orders of the court were that the proceedings would continue as directed, with specific instructions for the parties on the next steps. The court's decision provided clarity and a path forward for the resolution of the civil dispute. The detailed orders reflected the court's careful deliberation and its commitment to ensuring a fair and just outcome.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 2 July 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established