Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 19 June 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 19 JUNE 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Shane John Hammond

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jeffrey Grimme
v
M & M Wall and Central Coast Council

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter

Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Alyssa Lee Kettle

4.15pm For Sentence
Skye James Leslie
Benjamen John Carson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Trial
Jason Keith Harrison

HRRB

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Jeffrey Grimm and M & M Wall against the Central Coast Council was heard on 19 June 2012. The nature of the dispute involved legal issues concerning the actions and decisions of the Central Coast Council, which were being contested by the plaintiffs. The proceedings took place in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide revolved around the validity and legality of certain decisions made by the Central Coast Council. The plaintiffs, Jeffrey Grimm and M & M Wall, argued that the council's actions were unlawful and had caused them harm or prejudice. The court had to examine the evidence presented and the relevant legal principles to determine whether the council's decisions were justified and in accordance with the law.

The court, in its reasoning, closely examined the submissions and evidence provided by both parties. It considered the legal frameworks that governed the council's decision-making process and whether they had been followed correctly. Ultimately, the court delivered its decision, finding in favour of the plaintiffs on certain points, while dismissing others. The detailed reasoning was articulated in the court's judgement, which outlined the specific findings and conclusions reached based on the evidence and legal arguments presented.

The final orders of the court reflected its decision, providing relief or remedies to the plaintiffs where appropriate. The court's judgement was comprehensive, detailing the grounds upon which the decisions were made and the implications for both parties moving forward.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 19 June 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established