Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 18 September 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction

4.00 p.m.
For Judgment (by video-link)
Sue-Ellen Lewis
v
Paul Duffin

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood by video-link from Supreme Court, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction

4.00pm For Judgment
Sue-Ellen Lewis v. Paul Duffin

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued a law list for Tuesday, 18 September 2012, indicating scheduled hearings in various courts and matters. One of the cases listed for judgment via video-link was Sue-Ellen Lewis versus Paul Duffin, presided over by Justice Wood in Hobart. Another case, also involving Lewis and Duffin, was scheduled for judgment at 4.00pm in Launceston before Justice Wood, who was to participate via video-link from Hobart. These listings suggest the court was to provide a judgment in the ongoing dispute between the parties.

The legal issues in the case of Sue-Ellen Lewis versus Paul Duffin were not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, the nature of the dispute between Lewis and Duffin, coupled with the fact that it was scheduled for judgment, implies that the court would have to interpret relevant laws, consider presented evidence, and apply appropriate legal principles to resolve the dispute. The judgment would likely address the specific claims and defenses raised by the parties.

The reasoning and outcome of the case were not detailed in the text provided. However, the fact that it was scheduled for judgment indicates that the court had already heard arguments and evidence from both parties. The judgment would have involved the application of relevant legal principles to the facts of the case, leading to a resolution of the dispute. Given the nature of the case and the timing of the judgment, it is likely that the court would have made a decision based on the merits of the case and the applicable law.

No final orders were specified in the provided text. However, the Supreme Court would typically issue orders that reflect the court's decision in the case, which may include monetary awards, injunctions, or other remedies deemed appropriate to resolve the dispute between Lewis and Duffin.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 18 September 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established