SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 18 JUNE 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Bail Variation
Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
For Trial
Jake James Smith
3.30 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Christopher Harold Denny
4.15 p.m.
Via Video Link
For Mention
Bevan William Parkinson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Plea
ALC
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
9.45am For Trial
Brett Christopher Hayes
10.00am For Mention
Aaron Richard Thompson
BURNIE
10.00 am For Mention
Darrel Francis Saward
For Trial
Alan Robert Arkinstall
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 18 June 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 104
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 104
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues varied across the cases, encompassing bail variations, trial directions, pleas, and miscellaneous civil matters. Each case likely involved distinct legal arguments and facts, necessitating individual judicial attention. The bail variation for Troy Richard Vernon Lovell might have involved considerations of the accused's risk of flight, danger to the community, or interference with witnesses. Jake James Smith's trial would have required the court to address the prosecution's evidence and the defence's arguments. The directions hearing for Christopher Harold Denny would have involved procedural and evidentiary issues, while Bevan William Parkinson's mention could have pertained to updates or procedural steps in his case. Justice Pearce's plea hearing for ALC would have involved the accused entering a plea of guilty or not guilty. The civil case before Associate Justice Holt would have encompassed various civil disputes, potentially including contract, tort, or property issues. In Launceston, Brett Christopher Hayes's trial would have required the court to evaluate the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The mentions for Aaron Richard Thompson and Darrel Francis Saward might have involved updates on the status of their respective cases, while Alan Robert Arkinstall's trial would have similarly involved the presentation and evaluation of evidence and arguments.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.