SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 16 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
BLH
Aaron James Irwin
Luke Andrew Irwin
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
BJC
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Matthew Kent Goodman
For Trial
David William Michaelson
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
A Legal Practitioner
(Part Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Leigh Anthony Neil
4:15pm For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Charles Pitt
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Paul James Coppleman
v
Jessica Maree Godfrey
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Andrew Dennis Dare
Dylan Ray Webb
Madison Stuart Ansell
2:15 p.m. (not before 4:00 p.m.)
For Sentence
Peter Collins
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 16 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 190
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 190
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the determination of guilt or innocence for the defendants in various criminal cases, as well as the sentencing of Peter Collins. The court was required to consider the evidence presented, apply relevant legal principles, and make decisions based on the facts of each case. In the civil matter involving the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania and a legal practitioner, the court needed to address issues related to professional conduct and any potential disciplinary actions.
The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were not detailed in the provided text, but the nature of the cases and the legal issues suggest that the court would have carefully considered the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. The final orders for each case, including any findings of guilt, sentences, or disciplinary actions, would have been issued by the respective justices following the hearings. The detailed outcomes for each case would have been recorded in the court's official records.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.