SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 16 OCTOBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
CCH
v
State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Sentence
John Layoun
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Carl Maxwell Hall
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Andrew Ian Devine
Lewis Wayne Coles
Eugene William Smith
Civil Jurisdiction
In Chambers
4.30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via Telephone
Sincled Investments Pty Ltd & Anor
v
Commissioner of State Revenue
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
SRM
For Sentence
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Macuei Bona
Scott Brian Enslow
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
Shaun William Hill
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Application
Cook
v
Buckingham;
Gradco Pty Ltd
v
Buckingham
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
4.00 p.m. by telephone
Extend Time (mention)
Guest
V
West Tamar Council
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link from Court 8, Supreme Court, Hobart
SRM
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 16 October 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 199
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 199
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from the validity of the appeal against the state's decision to the merits of the bail application. In the appeal, the court had to examine whether the lower court's decision was correct in law and whether any procedural errors had occurred. For the bail application, the court considered the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and any other factors relevant to public safety. The reasoning of the court in these cases involved a meticulous review of the evidence presented, the applicable legal principles, and the circumstances of each case.
The outcome of these hearings was significant for the parties involved. The Court of Criminal Appeal's decision on the appeal would either uphold or overturn the lower court's ruling, potentially leading to further legal proceedings or a final resolution of the matter. The bail application's result determined whether the applicant would be granted bail, influencing their immediate liberty and the conditions under which they would await trial. The court's decisions were made with careful consideration of the law and the specific facts of each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.