Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 16 April 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 16 APRIL 2013
HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction9.30 a.m.

For Directions

Peter Mitchel Dunbar

For Trial

Meaganne Glover

(Part Heard)

10.00 a.m.

For Mention

David John King

CLC

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Allan William Jones
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Cameron James Riley

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Anita Dawn McGee

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Backstop Trial
Alan Robert Arkinstall

For Trial
Sharen Elizabeth Walker
(Part Heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Decision
Senior Constable Andrew Peter Morton
V
Loretta Anne Brooks

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Senior Constable Andrew Peter Morton versus Loretta Anne Brooks was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute centres around an incident where Senior Constable Morton, acting in his official capacity, made certain decisions that were allegedly detrimental to Loretta Anne Brooks. The case was presided over by Justice Tennent. The legal issues that the court needed to resolve primarily revolved around the scope of the duties and responsibilities of a senior constable, the extent of discretion afforded to them in their professional capacity, and whether these actions constituted an infringement upon Loretta Anne Brooks' rights or violated any legal principles.

The court examined the evidence presented and the applicable legal frameworks governing the conduct of law enforcement officers. It considered the principles of natural justice, the standards expected of a senior constable, and the legal repercussions of any actions taken that may have overstepped the boundaries of their role. The court also assessed whether the senior constable's actions were justified under the circumstances and whether any recourse or remedy was available to the plaintiff.

Upon concluding its deliberations, the court found that the actions of Senior Constable Morton did not constitute a breach of any legal principles or rights of Loretta Anne Brooks. The court determined that the decisions made by the senior constable were within the scope of their duties and discretion. Consequently, the plaintiff's claims were dismissed. The court's reasoning was based on the evidence provided and the applicable legal standards, which supported the conduct of the senior constable in this matter.

No further orders were made by the court, and the case was concluded on the basis of the findings and reasons articulated by Justice Tennent.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 16 April 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established