Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 September 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 15 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen

v
Russell David Potter
(Part Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Geoffrey Peter Radloff
Trent Andrew Flanagan
Benjamin Angus Shield

11.30 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel John Oakley
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Trial
Brodie Leigh Price

(Part Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Hearing via video-link to Launceston
RACT Pty Ltd
v
Clay Xavier Savage

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial
MNH

4:00pm For Hearing via video link to Hobart
RACT Pty Ltd v Clay Xavier Savage

COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Louise Jane Williams

2:15pm For Mention
Lokendra Singh

4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail
Liam Paul Brooks

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, on Tuesday, 15 September 2015, handled a variety of criminal and civil cases across its Hobart and Launceston locations. In Hobart, multiple criminal trials were scheduled, including the part-heard case of The Queen versus Russell David Potter and another part-heard trial involving Daniel John Oakley. Bail applications for Geoffrey Peter Radloff, Trent Andrew Flanagan, and Benjamin Angus Shield were also listed. Civil proceedings included a case brought by RACT Pty Ltd against Clay Xavier Savage, which was heard via video link from Launceston.

The legal issues in these cases encompassed a range of criminal charges, including potential defences and bail considerations. For the civil case, the primary focus would have been on the contractual or tortious claims made by RACT Pty Ltd against Clay Xavier Savage. The court was required to determine the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of legal principles relevant to the charges, and the appropriate legal standards for bail applications.

The court's reasoning and outcome would have been specific to each case, taking into account the evidence presented and the relevant laws. In criminal cases, the judges would have assessed the prosecution's evidence against the defence submissions to decide whether the accused was guilty or not guilty. For the civil case, the judge would have considered the merits of the claims and defenses presented by the parties. In the bail applications, the court would have weighed the circumstances of the case against the risk factors to determine the appropriate conditions for release.

The final orders would have been made accordingly, with detailed reasoning provided for each decision. These orders would have included directions for further hearings, judgments on the merits of the cases, and specific conditions for bail, if granted.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 September 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established