Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 March 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 49


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 15 MARCH 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Casey Richard Cowen

For Bail Application

Mark Anthony Bennett

For Application

Jamie Leigh Feil

Not Before 11:00 a.m.

For Legal Argument

Rodney Matthew Klye

Jodie Diane Earley

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Jessie James A’Hearne

2:15 p.m.

For Mention

Gail Lynne Delpero

For Sentence

Logan Kele Smith

Lisa Marie Triffitt

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

Luke Rogers

For Trial
Samuel William Murray Mulholland

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Matthew James Tate

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Tyson Lee Hannah

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Dyson Corporate Security Pty Ltd
v
Michelle Kerr
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors

Andrew John McCormack and Ors
v
Lihua Qin and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court For Mention via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tyson Lee Hannah

10:00am For Mention
Ryan Terrence Williams
Michael Anthony Slater
Anthony Charles Mare
Mitchael Leonard Daking Millier

To Follow
For Discharge
Ebony Michelle Broad

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Ethen Wayne Nicholls
Shannon Lee Ruffels
Katarzyna Wanda Stadnicka

To Follow
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail
Justin Joseph Ewell

To Follow
For Plea
DTQ

Not before 10:30am
For Trial (Part Heard)
John Benjamin Adams

4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Beau Anthony Weily

BURNIE
Criminal Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.

For Mention via video-link from Risdon Prison Complex
Graham John Ennis
HLC
Daryl John Streets

For Mention
Alan Robert Arkinstall
Daniel James Evans

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Hayden Luke Ryan

For Plea
Aaron Samuel Henrick

For Application to Breach Suspended Sentence
Nathan Gregory Coppleman

In Court as In Chambers
2.15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Nathan Thomas Smith

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 March 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 49
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 49
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of hearings on Tuesday, 15 March 2016, covering both civil and criminal matters. In the criminal jurisdiction, there were bail applications and sentence hearings for various defendants, including Casey Richard Cowen, Logan Kele Smith, and Lisa Marie Triffitt. Other cases involved trials and mentions, such as the trial of Luke Rogers and the sentencing of Matthew James Tate. Civil cases included trials and miscellaneous business, with notable cases being Dyson Corporate Security Pty Ltd v Michelle Kerr and Clarence City Council v Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors. The court also handled matters in Launceston and Burnie via video-link, addressing mentions, bail applications, and preliminary proceedings.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the granting or refusal of bail, the appropriateness of sentences, and the outcomes of trials in both criminal and civil cases. The court had to assess the evidence and arguments presented to determine whether bail should be granted or denied, whether the sentences imposed were appropriate, and whether the plaintiffs or defendants in civil cases had successfully proven their claims.

The court applied principles of criminal law and procedure to decide on bail applications, taking into account factors such as the severity of the alleged crime, the risk of flight or reoffending, and the interests of justice. In sentencing, the court considered the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and the principles of deterrence and rehabilitation. In civil matters, the court evaluated the merits of the cases based on the evidence and legal arguments provided by the parties.

The final orders of the court will reflect its decisions on bail applications, sentences, and the outcomes of trials. The outcomes will be communicated to the parties involved, and any further appeals or legal actions will be dependent on these decisions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.