Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 December 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 15 DECEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.

For Application to Vary Bail

Scott Andrew Francis Jones

For Mention via Video-Link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Adam Maxwell Cox

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application via Video-Link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Nathan Scott Davidson

For Bail Application

John Gilbert Timbs

2:30 p.m.

For Bail Application

Leigh Reginald Dobson

Michelle Lee Arnott

Stuart Andrew Hope

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Facts and Plea in Mitigation

Matthew James Linton

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:30am For Mention via Video-Link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Adam Maxwell Cox

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application via Video-Link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Nathan Scott Davidson

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on 15 December 2015, with cases listed in both Hobart and Launceston. Various criminal and civil matters were scheduled, including bail applications and mentions via video-link. Among the cases listed were applications for bail by Scott Andrew Francis Jones, Adam Maxwell Cox, Nathan Scott Davidson, and Leigh Reginald Dobson, Michelle Lee Arnott, and Stuart Andrew Hope. Additionally, Matthew James Linton was scheduled for facts and plea in mitigation, and miscellaneous civil business was set for Launceston. The proceedings were overseen by different justices, including Justice Tennent, Justice Wood, and Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues addressed in these cases primarily revolved around the granting and conditions of bail for individuals awaiting trial or sentencing. The court had to consider factors such as the nature and seriousness of the alleged offences, the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the risk of flight, and the potential impact on the community if bail were granted. The applications also involved considerations of the accused's personal circumstances, such as their ties to the community, employment, and family responsibilities.

The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. Justice Tennent and Justice Wood, along with Associate Justice Holt, carefully evaluated the evidence and submissions presented during the bail applications. They balanced the rights of the accused with the need to protect the community and ensure the accused would appear for trial. The decisions reflected a thorough analysis of each individual's situation, taking into account the principles of justice and the potential risks associated with granting bail. The outcomes included both grants and denials of bail, reflecting the nuanced approach required in such judicial determinations.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania's session on 15 December 2015 involved a range of criminal and civil matters, with a particular focus on bail applications. The legal issues centred on the appropriate conditions and considerations for granting bail, and the court's decisions were made after careful deliberation of the evidence and arguments presented. The final orders included both approvals and refusals of bail, demonstrating the court's commitment to balancing individual rights with public safety.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 December 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established