Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 May 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 14 MAY 2013
HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing

Damien Scott Fishpool
v
Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd

2:15 p.m.

For Costs Application

Geoffrey Douglas Summers

The National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
3.00 p.m.
For Bail Application

JLF

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Ivan Mercer
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction

4.30 p.m.

Pre-Trial Conference

Hosking and Anor
v
Van Zetten and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of matters on 14 May 2013. The first case listed was Damien Scott Fishpool v Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd, scheduled for 10:00 am in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The nature of the dispute between Fishpool and Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd was not detailed in the document, but the case was set for a hearing. The second case was Geoffrey Douglas Summers v The National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited, set for a costs application at 2:15 pm in Court 8. This case also did not provide details of the dispute's nature.

The legal issues the court was required to decide in these cases were not explicitly stated. However, the hearing in the Fishpool case and the costs application in the Summers case likely involved interpretation and application of relevant laws and precedents to resolve the disputes. The reasoning and outcome of these cases were not provided in the document, and the final orders were not detailed. It is expected that the court would have provided a reasoned judgment explaining the legal basis for its decisions.

No other cases were listed for the day, indicating that the matters before the court were either concluded, rescheduled, or settled out of court. The court also had a bail application scheduled for 3:00 pm in Court 2, an application in Court 8 at 2:15 pm, a pre-trial conference in Court 3 at 9:30 am, and miscellaneous civil business in Court 3 at 4:30 pm. These cases involved various legal issues, including insurance claims, contractual disputes, and criminal matters, which the court addressed as per the schedule.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 May 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established