Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 April 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 65


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 14 APRIL 2015

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before JUSTICE TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Decision
Tony John Pettit

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Denison Ong Chin Jui
Nicholas David McWilliams
Joseph Andrew Edwards

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 April 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 65
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 65
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Tony John Pettit was heard before Justice Tennent in the Supreme Court of Tasmania on April 14, 2015. The nature of the dispute involves criminal jurisdiction, with the case being listed for decision. Denison Ong Chin Jui, Nicholas David McWilliams, and Joseph Andrew Edwards were also listed before Justice Porter for sentencing in the same court, also on criminal jurisdiction grounds. Another case was heard before Associate Justice Holt in the same court under civil jurisdiction, but the specifics of the case were not detailed. Launceston and Burnie had no listed matters for that day.

The legal issues the court was required to decide in the case of Tony John Pettit involved criminal jurisdiction matters. The specifics of the charges or legal arguments were not provided in the document, but it is clear that the decision was pending. For the defendants Denison Ong Chin Jui, Nicholas David McWilliams, and Joseph Andrew Edwards, the legal issues likely involved the sentencing phase of their criminal cases. The court would need to consider the appropriate penalties based on the nature of the crimes, the defendants' backgrounds, and any mitigating or aggravating factors.

Justice Tennent provided a decision in the case of Tony John Pettit. The specifics of the decision were not outlined in the document, but the court's resolution was finalised. For the defendants Denison Ong Chin Jui, Nicholas David McWilliams, and Joseph Andrew Edwards, Justice Porter handed down their sentences. Again, the details of the sentences were not specified, but they were determined based on the legal and factual circumstances of their cases. The court's reasoning and the outcomes in both cases reflect the judicial process in addressing criminal and civil matters within the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.