SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 13 OCTOBER 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jack Owen Read
For Trial
Corey Adam Triffitt
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Sentence
Adam Daniel Linardi
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Samuel Alfred Watterson
Blake Cameron McPherson
For Trial
Hayden Charles Bannister
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before JUSTICE PORTER
10:00am For Mention
Linda Lee Jones
Tiffany Louise Shaw
Matthew Zurbo
To Follow For Trial
Josh Daniel Wilson
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Christopher Paul Walsh
2:00 p.m.
For Mention
Kaitlyn Maree Triffett
Patrick Wayne Dixon
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 13 October 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 220
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 220
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases ranged from criminal offences, such as those faced by Jack Owen Read, Corey Adam Triffitt, Samuel Alfred Watterson, Blake Cameron McPherson, Christopher Paul Walsh, Kaitlyn Maree Triffett, and Patrick Wayne Dixon, to civil disputes, such as those involving Linda Lee Jones, Tiffany Louise Shaw, and Matthew Zurbo. The outcomes of these hearings would depend on the evidence presented, legal arguments made, and the judge's interpretation of the law. Sentencing in criminal cases would consider factors such as the nature of the offence, the offender's background, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania's handling of these cases would involve careful consideration of the relevant laws, legal precedents, and the facts of each case. The court aimed to deliver justice in a timely and efficient manner, ensuring that all parties had the opportunity to present their cases and that the outcomes were fair and just. The outcomes of these hearings would contribute to the administration of justice in Tasmania, reflecting the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.