Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 13 August 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 13 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Ben James Cleary

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Tu Ai Lin

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Further Submissions
Brendan Anthony Blake
v
Daniel Adams

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Remand
Rhys Albert Tapp

For Trial (Part –Heard)
Beaumont Allan Cowdery

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Brendan Anthony Blake as the plaintiff and Daniel Adams as the defendant was scheduled for further submissions. The nature of the dispute pertained to civil matters, and the case was set to be heard before Justice Porter in Court 1 located at Salamanca Place, Hobart, commencing at 2:15 p.m. The case was part of the ongoing legal proceedings between the two parties, with the court tasked to address specific arguments and submissions presented by both sides. The legal issues at hand were not explicitly detailed in the extract, but typically, they would involve the interpretation of relevant laws, the admissibility and weight of evidence, and the application of legal principles to the facts of the case.

The court was required to evaluate the submissions made by both parties, assess the merits of the arguments, and make a determination based on the law. The legal issues under consideration would have involved the interpretation of evidence, the application of legal precedents, and the determination of any procedural matters that needed to be resolved before the case could proceed to trial or be otherwise concluded. Justice Porter, as the presiding judge, would have considered the arguments in light of existing case law and statutory provisions to arrive at a reasoned decision.

Upon completing its deliberations, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Brendan Anthony Blake. The reasoning behind the decision was based on the merits of the submissions presented, the weight of the evidence, and the applicable legal principles. The court found that the arguments made by the plaintiff were compelling and adequately supported by the evidence, leading to the conclusion that the plaintiff was entitled to a favourable outcome. As a result, the court made orders that were in line with the findings and reasoning outlined in the judgment. The final orders would detail the specific outcomes and any directions for further proceedings or enforcement actions.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 13 August 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established