Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 12 August 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 158


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 12 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone

Adrian John Hall

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness

For Bail Consent
Darren Leigh White

For Trial
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:45 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Charles Cuthbert
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Mention
BAS

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Gregory Brian O’Rourke 

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Leigh Anthony Neil

4:15pm For Sentence by video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Gregory Brian O’Rourke

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 12 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 158
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 158
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear a variety of cases on August 12, 2014. The court, presided over by Chief Justice Blow and Justice Porter, was set to handle several criminal matters, including directions hearings, bail consents, and trials. For instance, Adrian John Hall faced a directions hearing via telephone, while Katrina Anne Chatters and Stacie Anne Dwyer were scheduled for trial. Another significant case involved Rodney Charles Cuthbert, whose trial was part-heard and presided over by Justice Wood.

The legal issues that emerged from these cases primarily revolved around criminal law, including the procedural aspects of trials, the granting of bail, and the application of sentencing principles. The court had to ensure that the due process was followed in each case, including the rights of the accused, the presentation of evidence, and the interpretation of laws relevant to each specific case.

In delivering its judgments, the court meticulously considered the evidence presented, legal precedents, and the rights of the individuals involved. The outcome of each case varied based on the specifics of the charges and the evidence. For example, the directions hearing for Adrian John Hall likely focused on scheduling and procedural matters, whereas the trials for individuals such as Katrina Anne Chatters and Stacie Anne Dwyer would have involved a thorough examination of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence.

The final orders of the court, while not explicitly detailed in the document, would have included rulings on the procedural matters for the directions hearing, bail decisions, and trial outcomes. The court's decisions would have been communicated to the parties involved, and any appeals or further legal actions would have been outlined in subsequent court sessions or documented orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.