SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 12 AUGUST 2014
HOBART
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Adrian John Hall
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness
For Bail Consent
Darren Leigh White
For Trial
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:45 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Charles Cuthbert
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Mention
BAS
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Gregory Brian O’Rourke
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Leigh Anthony Neil
4:15pm For Sentence by video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Gregory Brian O’Rourke
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 12 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 158
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 158
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that emerged from these cases primarily revolved around criminal law, including the procedural aspects of trials, the granting of bail, and the application of sentencing principles. The court had to ensure that the due process was followed in each case, including the rights of the accused, the presentation of evidence, and the interpretation of laws relevant to each specific case.
In delivering its judgments, the court meticulously considered the evidence presented, legal precedents, and the rights of the individuals involved. The outcome of each case varied based on the specifics of the charges and the evidence. For example, the directions hearing for Adrian John Hall likely focused on scheduling and procedural matters, whereas the trials for individuals such as Katrina Anne Chatters and Stacie Anne Dwyer would have involved a thorough examination of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence.
The final orders of the court, while not explicitly detailed in the document, would have included rulings on the procedural matters for the directions hearing, bail decisions, and trial outcomes. The court's decisions would have been communicated to the parties involved, and any appeals or further legal actions would have been outlined in subsequent court sessions or documented orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.