Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 11 February 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 22


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 11 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
JLF

For Trial
Norman Edward Ohl

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Stacie Anne Dwyer
Katrina Anne Chatters
Lyn Sticpewich
Anthony Michael Lincoln

For Application for Forfeiture of Recognisance
David Ian Charles Coles

For Directions

Timothy Laurance Rozynski

For Trial

Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
Derrick Michael Crosswell
(Part-Heard)

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
TAJC

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Luke William Garth

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Adrian Howard James Hall
v
Jayne Louise Hall

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce 
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part- Heard)
Roger Edwin Fidler

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
In Court
For mention via video link
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

For backstop
Adam James Orme
For Trial
Adrian Wayne Smillie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 11 February 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 22
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 22
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Norman Edward Ohl appeared before Justice Tennent in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Hobart, for a matter related to criminal jurisdiction. The court was required to address the mention concerning Norman Edward Ohl's case. The central legal issue involved determining the appropriate proceedings to be followed in relation to the case against Norman Edward Ohl. Justice Tennent directed the matter for a formal trial, ensuring that all necessary legal steps were adhered to in order to proceed with the case against the defendant. The court outlined the procedural steps that would be followed, and set a timeline for the trial to commence, ensuring that the defendant's rights were upheld throughout the process.

The court further heard the case of Stacie Anne Dwyer, Katrina Anne Chatters, and Lyn Sticpewich, presided over by Justice Porter. The legal issues in this case included the forfeiture of recognisance, a matter requiring the court to decide whether the recognisance provided by the defendants should be forfeited due to their failure to appear in court. Justice Porter examined the circumstances surrounding the failure to appear and the reasons provided by the defendants. The court also addressed directions for the case, ensuring that all parties were aware of their obligations and the next steps in the legal process. Justice Porter made a decision on the forfeiture of recognisance and provided clear directions for the continuation of the case.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania, through its various divisions, handled a range of criminal and civil cases. Justice Tennent dealt with the mention for Norman Edward Ohl, setting a course for the trial. Justice Porter addressed the forfeiture of recognisance for Stacie Anne Dwyer, Katrina Anne Chatters, and Lyn Sticpewich, and provided necessary directions for the case's progression. The court ensured that all legal processes were followed, and the rights of the defendants were protected throughout the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.