Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 10 July 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 10 JULY 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Ivan Anthony
v
Maxam Australia Pty Ltd

The Queen
v
Registrar of the Magistrates Court of Tasmania at Burnie,
Ex parte, Ivan Anthony

Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Shane John Hammon

3.00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Thomas Rundle Mead

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am

For Trial (Part Heard)
William Tyler Frame

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ivan Anthony brought a case against Maxam Australia Pty Ltd, which was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the court lists, but it involved civil jurisdiction. In a separate matter, a criminal case was brought against Shane John Hammon, who was scheduled for sentencing. Additionally, there was an application for bail by Thomas Rundle Mead, which was to be heard in Court 3 in Hobart. Another criminal case, involving William Tyler Frame, was scheduled for trial in Burnie, with a part-heard trial listed for the morning.

The court was required to decide on several legal issues, including the merits of Ivan Anthony's case against Maxam Australia Pty Ltd, the appropriate sentence for Shane John Hammon, and the bail application of Thomas Rundle Mead. In the case of William Tyler Frame, the court would need to address the allegations against him and proceed with the trial as scheduled.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the court lists, and thus, specific judicial decisions cannot be summarised. However, it is noted that the cases were set for various stages, indicating that the court would be addressing the legal issues pertinent to each case. The outcomes of these proceedings would depend on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of relevant laws by the court.

No final orders were mentioned in the court lists, indicating that the outcomes of these cases were either pending or had not been finalised at the time of the publication.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 10 July 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established