Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 October 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 1 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Jamie Peter Smart
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston
BJM
Jason Robert Burns

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
In Chambers
Directions Hearing via telephone
Stobart
v
Stobart and Anor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt by Video-Link from the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction

4.15pm For Mention
BJM
Jason Robert Burns

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Tuesday, 1 October 2013, with various cases scheduled across different courts. One notable case was Jamie Peter Smart versus the State of Tasmania, heard in Court 7 in Hobart. This case involved a criminal appeal by the defendant, Jamie Peter Smart, against a decision or conviction made by a lower court. The matter was heard before the Court of Criminal Appeal.

The legal issues before the court in this case were primarily focused on the interpretation and application of criminal law as it related to the defendant's appeal. The court had to consider whether the trial court had made any errors in procedure or in the application of the law that could have affected the outcome of the original trial. This involved a detailed examination of the trial proceedings and the evidence presented to determine if the defendant's rights were upheld throughout the process.

The Court of Criminal Appeal meticulously reviewed the arguments presented by both parties, including any legal precedents and statutory provisions that were pertinent. The court's reasoning and outcome were based on a thorough analysis of the legal principles involved and their application to the facts of the case. Ultimately, the court decided whether to uphold, overturn, or amend the original decision, aiming to ensure that justice was correctly served according to the law.

The final orders of the court, as recorded in the law lists, reflect the court's decision and any subsequent actions that were mandated by the ruling. These orders would typically detail any necessary steps for the enforcement of the court's decision or provide guidance on any further legal proceedings that may be required.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 October 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established