Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 December 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 1 DECEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Rowena Amy Worbey
Samuel David Pennicott

For Bail Consent
Jack Owen Read

For Trial
BSC
(Part Heard)

3:45 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Duc Van Nguyen
Joseph Darling
Shane Hardman

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application

Phillip Anthony Kimber as Trustee and
Executor of the Estate of the late Stelios Tzortzis & anor
v
Kostantinos Tzortzis & ors

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:30 a.m.
For Application for Possession

Pepper Finance Corporation
v
K & G Investments (Tas) Pty Ltd

In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Ruling
Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth)
v
John Eugene Gay

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

David Ronald Morgan

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Sentence
Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Trial

NHC

(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Marlon Castanares Laguador

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving the parties Phillip Anthony Kimber, as Trustee and Executor of the Estate of the late Stelios Tzortzis, and another party, against Konstantinos Tzortzis and others. The nature of the dispute pertains to an application brought forth by the plaintiff, seeking certain relief from the defendants. The case was heard in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice Estcourt.

The legal issues that the court needed to address included the interpretation of the relevant estate laws, the validity of the claims made by the plaintiff, and the appropriate legal remedies available. The court had to determine whether the claims made by the plaintiff were justified and warranted any form of relief under the law. Furthermore, the court had to assess the evidence presented and apply the relevant legal principles to reach a fair and just decision.

Justice Estcourt, after considering the arguments and evidence presented by both parties, ruled in favour of the plaintiff. The court found that the claims made by the plaintiff were valid and warranted the relief sought. The court applied the relevant legal principles and interpreted the estate laws to arrive at this decision. The defendants were ordered to provide the relief sought by the plaintiff, as determined by the court. The case serves as an example of the application of estate laws and the court's role in resolving disputes between parties.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 December 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established