Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 8 March 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 36


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 8 MARCH 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Timothy William Daley
Allison Patricia Shipp
v
State of Tasmania

For Hearing
Tu Ai Lin
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Application
Waim Hassan Al Saji
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
Via video link to Burnie 
For Sentence  
Mathew David Buck

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00
For Mention
DKL
v
State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

Noon
Application for Evidence by Video Link/Extend Time
Woods
v
Eaton

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court
4.15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Hobart 
Mathew David Buck

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 8 March 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 36
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 36
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was convened on Thursday, 8 March 2012, with several cases listed across various courts. In Court 7, a criminal appeal was set to be heard by the Court of Criminal Appeal, involving Timothy William Daley and Allison Patricia Shipp against the State of Tasmania. The case was listed for mention, indicating an initial hearing or procedural discussion.

Also in Court 7, a part-heard case, Tu Ai Lin v State of Tasmania, was listed for continuation, suggesting that the case had previously been partially heard and was now returning for further proceedings. The nature of the case was criminal in nature, involving the defendant Tu Ai Lin and the state. Court 8 hosted another criminal case, with Justice TENNETT presiding over criminal jurisdiction matters.

In Court 2, Justice WOOD was scheduled to handle civil jurisdiction matters, with a mention listed for DKL v State of Tasmania. This case, like others listed, was to be heard in Hobart, the capital of Tasmania. Additionally, an application for evidence by video link or to extend time in Woods v Eaton was listed in Launceston, handled by Associate Justice HOLT. The detailed scheduling indicates a busy day for the court with a variety of cases spanning both civil and criminal jurisdictions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.