Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 7 June 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 7 JUNE 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Criminal jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Application to Review a Suspended Detention Order
ZSS

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Anthony Michael Blackaby

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Tanya Maree Devine

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Lewis Wayne Coles
Eugene William Smith

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Scott Lester Roberts

For Application Pursuant to Sentencing Act 1997
Gavin Raymond McIntosh

In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Aaron James Grant
(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
McEldowney
V
Payne & Ors

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear a number of cases on 7 June 2012. Among these was an application to review a suspended detention order in the matter of ZSS. This application was to be heard in Court 7, with Justice Evans presiding over the criminal jurisdiction of the court. Another matter of note was the preliminary proceedings application of Tanya Maree Devine, which was also set to be heard in Court 7.

The legal issues central to these cases involved the interpretation and application of the relevant sections of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009, as well as any pertinent case law concerning the rights of the accused under such statutes. The court would need to consider whether the detention order was justified and whether the applicant's rights had been properly safeguarded. The preliminary proceedings application would require the court to examine whether there were sufficient grounds for the proceedings to continue, including whether the evidence presented met the necessary legal standards.

The court’s reasoning and outcome were not provided in the document. However, it is expected that the court would deliver detailed judgments addressing the legal principles at stake, the facts of each case, and the application of the law to these facts. The final orders would likely detail whether the detention order was upheld, modified, or overturned, as well as any directives for the continuation or cessation of the preliminary proceedings.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 7 June 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established