Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 6 November 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 237


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 6 NOVEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Nathan Robert Griffith
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison
Brent Anthony Cordwell
Jamie Reginald Hall
Darren Michael Dobson

For Mention
Brendan Peter Honner
Robert Raymond Kaye
SSE

For Preliminary Proceedings Indication
Ronald Peter Walker
Cameron James Riley
Mickheal Bechara
Wayne Gregory Pattison

For Directions Hearing
Fabian James Ackerley Trueman

For Plea
Paul Wayne Simpson
Nicholas Caleb Grimes
EJR

For Facts and Sentence
Daniel John Denny

For Plea
Michael James Harris
Samuel John Devine
John Darren Rowbottom
Jess Aaron Morgan
RM
Derek Graeme Leslie Smith
Zachary Henry Adams

For Facts and Sentence
Dylan Vincent Phillips

For Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence
Nicole Maree McGowan

2:15 p.m.
For Legal Submissions via Video-Link to Hopkins Correctional Centre, Victoria
KWEF

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Submissions

Scott Clifford Mitchell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. 
For Mention
Rodney Matthew Klye

For Bail Consent
Timothy John Best
Benjamin Michael Fama

For Decision
Adrian Raymond Nattey

For Disputed Facts Hearing
Joseph Andrew Edwards

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Set Aside Judgment
Boat Harbour Beach Blue Waters Pty Ltd
v
Matthews Properties Pty Ltd and Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness

10:00am For Plea
Trent Phillip Tuthill

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiciton
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nicholas Charles Pitt

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 6 November 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 237
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 237
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard by Justice Tennent in Hobart. The case involved a dispute between Boat Harbour Beach Blue Waters Pty Ltd and Matthews Properties Pty Ltd and others. The plaintiffs sought to set aside a previous judgment made in the case. The legal issues in the case focused on the validity of the previous judgment and whether there were grounds to set it aside.

The court examined the circumstances surrounding the original judgment and the reasons why the plaintiffs sought to have it set aside. Justice Tennent considered whether there were any errors in the original judgment or if there were any procedural issues that warranted the setting aside of the judgment. After careful consideration, the court concluded that there were no valid grounds to set aside the original judgment. The court found that the judgment was properly made and that there were no errors or procedural issues that would justify setting it aside.

The court's decision was final, and there were no further appeals or legal proceedings in the matter. The court's ruling upheld the original judgment, and the plaintiffs were not successful in their attempt to have it set aside. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted fairly and without error, and that any challenges to a judgment must be based on valid legal grounds.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.