Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 5 July 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 5 JULY 2013

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Nicholas Charles Pitt

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a dispute between the parties, whose names have not been disclosed due to legal restrictions. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the court list, but it was scheduled for mention in the criminal jurisdiction court. The court hearing was set to take place at 10.00 a.m. in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart, with Justice Pearce presiding over the matter. Another case, which involved civil jurisdiction, was also scheduled for the same day at 9.15 a.m. in Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt. This case was to be heard via a video link to Burnie.

The legal issues the court was required to decide were not explicitly stated in the provided court list. However, given the context of the hearing being in the criminal jurisdiction, it can be inferred that the case likely involved matters related to criminal law, such as the interpretation of statutes, the admissibility of evidence, or sentencing. The civil jurisdiction case, on the other hand, could have involved disputes related to contractual obligations, property rights, or personal injury claims.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not detailed in the provided court list. The court would have considered the evidence presented by the parties, applied relevant laws, and rendered a decision based on the merits of the case. Justice Pearce and Associate Justice Holt would have presided over the hearings, ensuring that the proceedings were conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. The final orders of the court would have been communicated to the parties involved in the respective cases.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 5 July 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established