SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 30 OCTOBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Victor Marshall
Tanya Maree Devine
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)
2:15 p.m.
For Plea
George Maryon
4:15 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
BCK
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Trial
Gregory Patrick Kotynia-English
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Adrian Raymond Nattey
For Voir Dire
Tye Matthew Curtain
2:15p.m.
For Trial
Tye Matthew Curtain
(Part-Heard)
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
4:15p.m.
For Discontinuance of Appeal
PFC v State of Tasmania
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
Not before 11:30 a.m.
For Decision
Bulk Frozen Foods Pty Ltd
v
Kim David Excell
2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
The Friends’ School Inc
v
Gillian Edmiston
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via Video-link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Coby Wells
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiciton
10:00am For Legal Argument
Nicholas Charles Pitt
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 30 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 231
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 231
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose in these cases likely included procedural matters such as the scheduling of hearings, the handling of pleas, and possibly the consideration of bail or other interim orders. The court's role in these hearings would have been to manage the court's calendar, ensure that the rights of the defendants were respected, and facilitate the progress of the cases towards resolution.
Justice Tennant's reasoning and outcome in these matters would have been guided by the specific circumstances of each case. For the mention hearings, the court would have confirmed the dates for future hearings and possibly addressed any procedural issues that needed resolution before the cases could proceed. For the plea hearings, the court would have accepted or deferred pleas and scheduled sentencing or further hearings as appropriate. The final orders would have been communicated directly to the parties involved, outlining the next steps in their respective cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.