Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 3 May 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 72


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 3 MAY 2012

HOBART LIST
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Via video link from Burnie
For Sentence
SEWL
BPMH

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Further Directions Hearing
Samuel John Devine
Alicia Simone Arnol

For Mention
MAR
Norton Dudley Williamson
Patrick Thomas Court
Patricia Dawn Baines

For Sentence
Andrew Leigh Webb
Belinda Lee Golding   

For Plea
Rodney Owen Richardson

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Wayne Peter Bannister

For Trial
RBG
(Part Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Noel Alan Percy

For Mention via video link
BWJK
Jack William Court
Patrick Arthur Burling
Ashton Frederick Jones

For Sentence via video link
Zach Muir Bennett

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
TCT
(part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Anthony Colin Finnegan

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.00 a.m.
Summary Judgment
Via video link to Launceston
Caltas Pty Ltd
V
Jacobs & Anor

12.00 p.m.
Appoint Litigation Guardian
Begum
V
Loft

4.00 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference by telephone
Trumbull-Ward
V
Michell

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction

9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Timothy Hudson
Neville Lindsay Whiting

10.00am For Mention
Skye Chantelle Kaye
Teena Louise Kelly

In Court As In Chambers
For Bail Application
Christopher Ernest Denman

For Directions Hearing
Alastair Neil May
Scott Cameron Parker
Joshua Daniel Wilson
Rikki James Williams
Skye James Leslie
Michael Anthony Slater

For Plea
Tegan Lee Odgers
Corey Joseph Ford
Christopher Sullivan
Nathan Leslie Newley

Not before 11.30am
For Plea
Kevin Charles Rose

2.15pm For Plea
Melissa Jayne Gibbons

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction

4.00pm For Sentence
SEWL
BPMH

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 3 May 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 72
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 72
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was engaged in a variety of legal proceedings as outlined in the law lists for Thursday, 3 May 2012. Cases were heard in both criminal and civil jurisdictions across multiple locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, with some sessions conducted via video link or telephone to accommodate remote parties. Notable matters included sentencing, plea hearings, preliminary proceedings, and summary judgment applications.

Legal issues varied across the cases, ranging from sentencing applications in criminal matters to civil disputes involving summary judgment and litigation guardianship. For example, Justice Tennant presided over a plea hearing for a defendant in Burnie, while Justice Porter handled a summary judgment application between Caltas Pty Ltd and Jacobs & Anor in Launceston. The court also dealt with more procedural matters such as appointing litigation guardians and conducting pre-trial conferences.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the law lists, but the variety of proceedings suggests that each case was considered on its merits. The court ensured that justice was administered efficiently across different jurisdictions, leveraging technology to facilitate remote participation where necessary. Outcomes for each case would have been communicated directly to the parties involved.

The final orders and outcomes for each case would have been communicated directly to the parties involved. The detailed scheduling of the court's activities ensured that justice was administered efficiently and effectively across multiple locations and jurisdictions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.