Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 29 November 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 29 NOVEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For Bail Consent
Shane Rodney Narracott
Mathew Wayne Tennant

For Judgment
Leigh David Jeffrey

For Trial
Stuart Barry Russell
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For Directions Hearing
Katherine Anne Hall
Wayne Trevor Ploughman
Andrew Darrel Legge
Shaun Edward Murtagh

For Plea
James William Lynch
Timothy Cawthorn

2.15pm
For Voir Dire
Louis Alexander Penny

4.15pm
For Sentence
Jason Nicholas Gulliver

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10am
For Hearing
Cameron John Mahon
v
Constable Sally Craig

2:15pm
For Directions Hearing
In the matter of the Estate of Marnie Maconachie

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Tennent
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am
For Trial
David Kronenberg and Robyn Kronenberg
v
Stephen Bridge and Stuart Tanner
(Part Heard)

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Plea
Hamish Alistair Kerr

2.15pm For Sentence
Thomas James Aliano

Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Senior Sergeant John Parker v Stacey Amanda Bessell

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court

10am For Mention
Matthew Julian Foster

For Application
Thai Michael Davern

For Trial (Part Heard)
BKP

2.15pm For Application
JMWM

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued a series of court lists for Thursday, 29 November 2012. These lists detailed a variety of cases scheduled for hearing in both criminal and civil jurisdictions across different locations in Tasmania. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases involved bail consent, judgment, trial, directions hearing, plea, and sentencing. Notable cases include the bail consent application for Shane Rodney Narracott and Mathew Wayne Tennant, a judgment for Leigh David Jeffrey, and a trial for Stuart Barry Russell. In civil jurisdiction, matters ranged from hearings to trials, such as the hearing for Cameron John Mahon against Constable Sally Craig and a part-heard trial between David Kronenberg and Robyn Kronenberg against Stephen Bridge and Stuart Tanner.

The legal issues addressed by the court were diverse, reflecting the broad spectrum of criminal and civil matters brought before the Supreme Court of Tasmania. In criminal cases, issues included the granting of bail, the passing of judgment, and the sentencing of individuals found guilty. For civil cases, the focus was on hearings related to disputes between parties and ongoing trials. The court had to consider the evidence and arguments presented in each case to make decisions that adhered to the principles of justice and the relevant laws of Tasmania.

The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were determined by the judges presiding over each case. Justice Evans, Justice Porter, Justice Blow, Justice Tennent, Chief Justice Crawford, and Justice Wood each played a role in adjudicating the cases assigned to them. The outcomes of these hearings would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence, legal arguments, and any applicable laws. The court's decisions were expected to be delivered in accordance with the judicial process and the legal framework governing both criminal and civil matters in Tasmania. Specific outcomes for each case were not detailed in the provided lists but would be documented in subsequent court records or judgments.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 29 November 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established