SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 28 MARCH 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tu Ai Lin
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
CJW
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
11:45 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision
Rhys Alan Felmingham
v
Graeme John Fish
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
11.30 a.m.
For Judgment
Matthew Ody
v
Claire Andrews
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11.30 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim/Discovery
Dimmick
v
Coad
CEREMONIAL SITTING
There will be a special ceremonial sitting to mark the retirement of
the Honourable Chief Justice Ewan Crawford in the No 1 Civil Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart at 2.15 p.m. on Thursday 28th March 2013.
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 28 March 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 47
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 47
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved both criminal and civil matters. In the criminal realm, the court was set to hear a directions hearing for Tu Ai Lin and sentence CJW. The civil cases included a decision on an amended statement of claim and discovery in the matter of Dimmick v Coad, and a judgment in the case of Rhys Alan Felmingham v Graeme John Fish. These cases likely involved a range of legal issues, such as sentencing guidelines, procedural matters, and disputes over claims and defenses in civil litigation.
The reasoning and outcome of each case were not detailed in the provided excerpt. The court's approach to each matter would have involved interpreting relevant laws, applying judicial principles, and considering the evidence and arguments presented by the parties involved. The outcomes would have been determined based on these factors, with the court making decisions that reflect the application of legal standards to the specific circumstances of each case.
The final orders and outcomes of the listed cases were not provided in the excerpt. However, each case would have concluded with the court issuing orders or judgments that resolved the legal issues presented, providing a resolution to the disputes or setting out the next steps in the legal process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.