Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 28 February 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Adam Robert Groenwege
v
The State of Tasmania

2:00 p.m.
For Hearing
Jervis Holloway
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.30 p.m.
For Sentence via video link
Darrell John Smith

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Orders
Raymond Leigh Silva

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
Interrogatories/Amend Statement of Claim/Discovery
McCarthy & Anor
v
VOS Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd & Anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard involving Adam Robert Groenwege who brought a matter against the State of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the extract but the hearing was scheduled for 10 a.m. before the Court of Criminal Appeal. Another case involving Jervis Holloway against the State of Tasmania was also scheduled for hearing at 2 p.m. before the same court. The legal issues that would have been considered by the Court of Criminal Appeal would likely have involved the interpretation of criminal law and the application of legal precedents pertinent to the cases at hand. The outcome of these hearings would have been contingent upon the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties.

In the same court, Darrell John Smith faced sentencing via video link at 4.30 p.m. before Justice PORTER. The nature of the crime and the arguments made during the trial would have influenced the sentence. Raymond Leigh Silva's case was scheduled for orders at 2.15 p.m. before Justice PORTER. This case would have involved civil jurisdiction, possibly pertaining to contractual disputes or personal injury claims. The outcome would depend on the interpretation of relevant statutes and case law, as well as the specific facts of the case.

The final orders from these hearings would have been communicated directly to the parties involved, detailing the court's decisions and any subsequent actions required by either party. The detailed outcomes and reasoning behind the court's decisions would have been provided in written judgments that would have been available to the public, subject to any restrictions on publication of names and details mandated by law.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 28 February 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established