Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 26 September 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 194


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 26 SEPTEMBER 2013

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention

Ben James Cleary

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence by Video-Link to Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Travis Leigh Frankcombe

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Timothy Laurance Rozynski
Brett Nathan Webb
Maxwell Alexander Jacques
Shane Paul Bennett
Nicholas Charles Pitt

For Plea
Alexander Brett White
Brett Anthony Lawless

For Breach Hearing
Jamie William Waller

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Karena Joi Mundy
Richard Anthony Schultz

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
ALC

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Dion Oscar Abel

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Corey Adam Triffitt

For Directions Hearing
Stephen Garry Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe

For Bail Application
Carol Devine

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Leigh Prior

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Rhiannon Alleshia Harmon
Jamie Nathan O’Toole
Sean Gregory Richardson

For Trial (Part-Heard)
PTB

2.15pm For Bail Application
Robert Craig Williams

4.15pm For Sentence by Video-Link to Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Travis Leigh Frankcombe

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 26 September 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 194
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 194
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of court listings on Thursday, 26 September 2013, in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The Hobart listings included cases before Chief Justice Blow, Justice Tennent, and Justice Porter, involving various criminal matters such as mentions, sentencing, pleas, and breach hearings. Launceston's court listings also featured criminal cases before Justice Tennent, with mentions, preliminary proceedings applications, bail applications, and trials. Burnie did not have any listings on this date. These listings indicate a range of criminal cases under consideration, reflecting the court's active role in managing and adjudicating on legal matters within its jurisdiction.

The legal issues presented in these cases likely encompass a broad spectrum of criminal law topics, including sentencing procedures, plea negotiations, breach of bail conditions, and preliminary hearings. The court's task was to address each case according to the specific legal principles and precedents applicable to the nature of the charges and the circumstances of the defendants. This involves interpreting and applying statutes, assessing the evidence presented, and ensuring that the rights of the accused are upheld while delivering justice.

The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case would depend on the particular facts and legal arguments presented. For instance, in sentencing hearings, the court would consider the severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In plea hearings, the court would determine whether the accused accepts the charges and the terms of any plea agreements. For bail applications, the court would weigh the risk of the accused failing to appear in court against the potential for pre-trial detention to infringe on the accused's rights. The outcomes of these hearings would determine the next steps in each case, including potential sentences, bail conditions, or the scheduling of further hearings.

No specific final orders were noted in the listings, but the outcomes of these hearings would dictate the subsequent legal processes for each case. The court's decisions would influence the progression of each defendant's legal journey, potentially impacting their freedom, the charges they face, and the terms under which they might be released pending further court appearances.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.