SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 26 SEPTEMBER 2013
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Ben James Cleary
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence by Video-Link to Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Travis Leigh Frankcombe
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Timothy Laurance Rozynski
Brett Nathan Webb
Maxwell Alexander Jacques
Shane Paul Bennett
Nicholas Charles Pitt
For Plea
Alexander Brett White
Brett Anthony Lawless
For Breach Hearing
Jamie William Waller
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Karena Joi Mundy
Richard Anthony Schultz
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
ALC
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Dion Oscar Abel
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Corey Adam Triffitt
For Directions Hearing
Stephen Garry Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe
For Bail Application
Carol Devine
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Leigh Prior
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Rhiannon Alleshia Harmon
Jamie Nathan O’Toole
Sean Gregory Richardson
For Trial (Part-Heard)
PTB
2.15pm For Bail Application
Robert Craig Williams
4.15pm For Sentence by Video-Link to Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Travis Leigh Frankcombe
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 26 September 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 194
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 194
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues presented in these cases likely encompass a broad spectrum of criminal law topics, including sentencing procedures, plea negotiations, breach of bail conditions, and preliminary hearings. The court's task was to address each case according to the specific legal principles and precedents applicable to the nature of the charges and the circumstances of the defendants. This involves interpreting and applying statutes, assessing the evidence presented, and ensuring that the rights of the accused are upheld while delivering justice.
The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case would depend on the particular facts and legal arguments presented. For instance, in sentencing hearings, the court would consider the severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In plea hearings, the court would determine whether the accused accepts the charges and the terms of any plea agreements. For bail applications, the court would weigh the risk of the accused failing to appear in court against the potential for pre-trial detention to infringe on the accused's rights. The outcomes of these hearings would determine the next steps in each case, including potential sentences, bail conditions, or the scheduling of further hearings.
No specific final orders were noted in the listings, but the outcomes of these hearings would dictate the subsequent legal processes for each case. The court's decisions would influence the progression of each defendant's legal journey, potentially impacting their freedom, the charges they face, and the terms under which they might be released pending further court appearances.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.