Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 26 June 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 26 JUNE 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Arvind Ravinesh Prasad
Dean Andrew Mazey

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Rhys Louis Gardner
Michael John Gardner

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am for Sentence
Simon Andrew Peters

10:00am For Trial
Brady Allan Pyke

4:00pm For Bail Application
Anthony Barclay Fisher

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am For Hearing (Part-Heard)
Debbie Maree Fielding v Leon Lyall Bramich

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. (via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
For Bail Consent
Mark Christopher Bramich

For Mention
Hayden Murray Saunders

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Dale Wayne Williams

For Bail Application
Madison Stuart Ansell

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held court on June 26, 2014, with various cases scheduled across different jurisdictions. In Hobart, before Justice Porter, a plea was expected from Arvind Ravinesh Prasad and Dean Andrew Mazey. Later in the day, Justice Porter was scheduled to sentence Rhys Louis Gardner and Michael John Gardner. In Launceston, before Justice Pearce, Simon Andrew Peters was due to be sentenced, and Brady Allan Pyke was scheduled for a trial. Associate Justice Holt presided over a civil hearing in Launceston involving Debbie Maree Fielding against Leon Lyall Bramich. In Burnie, before Justice Wood, several applications and mentions were scheduled, including a bail application from Madison Stuart Ansell.

The court was required to address a range of legal matters, from criminal pleas and sentencing to civil disputes and bail applications. The key issues involved interpreting and applying relevant laws to the facts of each case, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal standards. For the criminal cases, the court needed to consider the severity of the offences, the defendants' backgrounds, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In the civil case, the focus was on resolving the dispute between the parties based on evidence and applicable legal principles.

The court's reasoning and outcomes would have been based on a thorough examination of the evidence presented, legal arguments made by the parties, and relevant case law. Justice Porter and Justice Pearce, along with Associate Justice Holt and Justice Wood, would have assessed the credibility of witnesses, the weight of the evidence, and the applicable legal standards to reach a decision in each case. The outcomes would reflect the court's determination of guilt, the appropriate sentence, or the resolution of the civil dispute.

No final orders were provided in the extract, but the court's decisions would have been communicated to the parties and potentially recorded in court transcripts or judgments. Each case would have been resolved according to the specific legal and factual circumstances presented, with the court ensuring that due process was followed and justice was served.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 26 June 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established