Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 23 October 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 225


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 23 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea (via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie)
Matthew Brian Williams

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Directions Hearing
Asador Hinsta

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Plea (via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
Matthew Brian Williams

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 23 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 225
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 225
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Thursday, 23 October 2014, with several criminal matters listed for hearing. In Court 1 located at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice Porter, a plea was scheduled for Matthew Brian Williams via a video link to the Supreme Court at Alexander Street, Burnie. In Launceston, at the Cameron Street courthouse, Justice Pearce presided over a directions hearing for Asador Hinsta. In Burnie, at the Alexander Street courthouse, also before Justice Porter, a plea for Matthew Brian Williams was scheduled, with the hearing conducted via a video link from the Salamanca Place courthouse in Hobart.

The primary legal issues in these matters involved the formal entry of pleas by the respective defendants and the determination of procedural directions for the case involving Asador Hinsta. The court had to address whether the defendants were properly represented, understand the charges against them, and were in a position to enter a plea. For Asador Hinsta's case, the court needed to outline the next steps in the proceedings, ensuring that both parties were aware of the procedural requirements and any forthcoming deadlines.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Porter and Justice Pearce confirmed that the defendants were legally represented and fully understood the charges. For Matthew Brian Williams, the court accepted the pleas entered via video link, ensuring that all legal requirements were met. Regarding Asador Hinsta, the court provided clear procedural directions, setting out the timeline for further hearings and any necessary disclosures. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to these directions to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the proceedings.

The final orders included the acceptance of Matthew Brian Williams' pleas and the issuance of procedural directions for Asador Hinsta's case, outlining the next steps and any deadlines that needed to be met. Both defendants were advised of their rights and the implications of the proceedings moving forward.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.