Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 23 June 2016 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 23 JUNE 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Application for Legal Assistance via video link to Court 1, Launceston
Stuart Barry Russell
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m.

For Directions Hearing

Nicholas Peter Street

Tasmania Police & Anor

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Facts and Plea in Mitigation

Robyn Diane Cotton

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Katy Dorothy Devine
Adam John Jenkins

For Trial
Adrian Eugene Kelleher
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
NWH

For Plea
Mark William Wall

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar
Jay John Bradford
ZSS
Aaron John Salveson

For Mention
Ricky John Pearce
Ricky John Smith
Joel Matthew Maddox

For Trial
George Syrginis
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Jason Kerry Luttrell

4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail
Maxwell Alexander Jacques

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Gregory John Medcraft
10:30am
For Trial (Part Heard)
Jacob Adam Williams

4:15pm For Application for Legal Assistance via video link to Court 7, Hobart (Part Heard)
Stuart Barry Russell v State of Tasmania

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Mention via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore v TLR

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Timothy Peter Hingston

4:15pm
For Mention
Zoe Lee Griffiths

Civil Jurisdiction
To Follow
For Mention via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore v TLR

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, several cases were scheduled for Thursday, 23 June 2016. One of the cases involved Stuart Barry Russell, who applied for legal assistance via a video link to Court 1 in Launceston. The respondent in this matter was the State of Tasmania. Another case listed for directions hearing was Nicholas Peter Street against Tasmania Police and another party. A bail consent application was filed by Katy Dorothy Devine and Adam John Jenkins, while Robyn Diane Cotton had a bail application. Adrian Eugene Kelleher had a part-heard trial, and Mark William Wall was scheduled for a plea hearing. In Launceston, Gregory John Medcraft had a trial scheduled, and Jacob Adam Williams had a part-heard trial.

The court was required to address several legal issues in these cases. For the application of Stuart Barry Russell, the court needed to determine if legal assistance via video link was appropriate. The directions hearing for Nicholas Peter Street required the court to set out the next steps in the case. The bail applications for Katy Dorothy Devine and Adam John Jenkins and Robyn Diane Cotton required the court to assess the risk of flight and the likelihood of reoffending. The trial for Adrian Eugene Kelleher and the plea for Mark William Wall required the court to determine the outcome of the cases. In Launceston, the court needed to decide on the outcomes of the trials for Gregory John Medcraft and Jacob Adam Williams.

The reasoning and outcome of each case would depend on the specific facts and evidence presented. The court would consider the legal arguments and submissions made by the parties and apply the relevant laws and legal principles. The court would then make a decision based on the evidence and arguments presented. The final orders would be recorded in the court's records and communicated to the parties involved. The outcomes of these cases would have legal consequences for the parties involved and could potentially set legal precedents for future cases.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 23 June 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established