Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 22 March 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 22 MARCH 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Patrick Arthur Burling

For Sentence
Andrea Suzanne Fitzgerald

For Plea
Kristin Callie Anthena Jacobson
TAJC

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
TCT
(Part-Heard)

2.15 p.m.
For Mention
RJE

Court2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Eagle Sea Pty Ltd
v
Radford and anor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous civil business

11.30 a.m
Set aside service of Writ
Lowth
V
Simmons Wolfhagen (A Firm) and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jason David Gower
Shane Murray Brown

10.00am For Application
BPA

Civil Jurisdiction
4.00pm For Judgment
Sergeant Gary Lusted & Anor. v. David Anthony Saunders

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice Tennent

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
Shaun James Fletcher-Jones
v
Taneka Anne Dunham

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Tennent

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Basha Enquiry
Daniel James Latimore
Robin John Jago
Katrina Louise Gregory

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving the defendant Patrick Arthur Burling was set for mention and sentencing, while Kristin Callie Anthena Jacobson was scheduled for a plea hearing. Additionally, a part-heard trial for TCT was set for the same day. Another case, Eagle Sea Pty Ltd v Radford and another, was listed for hearing before the Associate Justice. This case concerned a dispute over the service of writ, which was set aside. The court also heard an application for a bash enquiry for Daniel James Latimore, Robin John Jago, and Katrina Louise Gregory.

The legal issues that arose in these cases included the appropriate sentences to be imposed on the defendants, the validity of the service of writ, and the procedural aspects of the bash enquiry. The court had to consider the principles of sentencing, the rules of civil procedure, and the specific circumstances of each case.

The court's reasoning and outcomes varied according to the specific issues in each case. For instance, in the matter of Eagle Sea Pty Ltd v Radford and another, the court had to determine whether the service of writ was valid. In the case of Daniel James Latimore, Robin John Jago, and Katrina Louise Gregory, the court examined the evidence and arguments presented in the bash enquiry to make its decision. The court's final orders were made in accordance with the law and the facts of each case.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 22 March 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established