SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 21 FEBRUARY 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention via Video Link
Nicholas Barry Wordsworth
Michael John Gardner
Rhys Louis Gardner
Ashton Mitchell Gill
Tristan Michael Daly
For Further Directions Hearing
Kellie Anne Kingston
For Plea
Scott Graham Campbell
Matthew Wayne Tennant
Bradley Andrew Edward Devine
Darrel John Smith
For Bail Consent
Adrian Lloyd Reardon
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Further Directions
Mark William Eather
For Plea
CJW
For Trial
CJC
(Part Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Asador Hinsta
DWGP
Mark William Flanagan
TAP
Keegan Bryan Pallier
For Bail Variation
Gary James Harper
For Sentence
Matthew Wayne Leslie
For Directions Hearing
India Josephine Lily Sultana
Michael Vernon Lowe
For Bail Application
Shaun Keverall Kaye
For Plea
Gerrard Enes Berberovic
Darryl Scott Donohue
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing (Part-Heard)
Blackley Investments Pty. Ltd. v. Burnie City Council
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Taylor Maree Cox
2:15pm
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Stephen James Gatenby
Alan Robert Arkinstall
For Plea
Scott Thomas Clarke
(Part-Heard)
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 21 February 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 21
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 21
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from preliminary proceedings to sentencing. In the criminal cases, the court was required to decide on bail variations, pleas, and the admissibility of evidence. In the civil case, Blackley Investments Pty. Ltd. v. Burnie City Council, the court needed to address issues related to the validity and enforcement of council decisions. Each case presented specific legal questions that the court had to resolve based on the evidence and arguments presented.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the document. However, the court was expected to follow established legal principles and precedents in reaching its decisions. The outcomes of the hearings would depend on the specific facts and arguments presented in each case. The final orders, including any sentences, bail decisions, or civil judgments, would be communicated in subsequent documents or court records.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.