SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Sean Timothy Hudson
v
State of Tasmania
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Application
Rodney James Allan
v
State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Judgment (by video-link to Launceston)
Kim Hibble
v
B
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
2.15 p.m.
Interrogatories
Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd & Ors
4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Purton & Anor
v
Jackson & Ors
4.15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Handley
v
Hindley & Anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Wood by video-link from Supreme Court, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00pm For Judgment
Kim Hibble v B
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 20 September 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 179
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 179
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Another criminal case was Rodney James Allan versus the State of Tasmania, scheduled for 4:00 p.m. in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice Wood. This case was also not detailed in the list, but it was listed for an application. The legal issues in these cases would likely revolve around the interpretation and application of criminal law and procedure, as well as the rights and obligations of the parties involved.
The court list also included civil cases, one of which was Kim Hibble versus B. This case was scheduled for judgment at 4:00 p.m. in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt. The specific legal issues in this case were not detailed in the list, but the outcome would likely depend on the interpretation and application of civil law, including any relevant statutes and case law. The final orders in this matter were not specified in the list provided.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.