Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 June 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 114


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 19 JUNE 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Judgment
Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Norman Edward Ohl

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Nicolau Francisco Soares
(Part-Heard)

Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m. via video link
For Mention
BAS

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

2.00 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application via video link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Launceston
JCS 

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart 
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m. via video link from Court 1, Cameron St, Launceston
For Directions
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
David Ronald Morgan

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice Blow
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Constable Alisha Anne Barnes
v
Gina Maree Dale

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Macquarie Builders Pty Ltd
V
HR Group Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

Not before 2:15 p.m.
Validate Appointment
In the matter of an application by Paul John Cook and Johnathon Robert Murrell in their capacity as joint and several administrators of Universal Energy Services Pty Ltd

Amend Statement of Claim
Davis
v
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Haines
v
Martindale

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce 
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Stephen John Jackman

4:00pm For Directions via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
David Ronald Morgan

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Daniel Reginald Clarke

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Mark Christopher Bramich

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Dale Wayne Williams

For Plea
Corey George Barnes
Leonie Rose King
Peter Geoffrey Webb
Simon Cole Wigg

For Application
Brock Berry

4:15 p.m.
For Mention (via video link)
BAS

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 June 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 114
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 114
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Court of Criminal Appeal heard an appeal against conviction and sentence by Norman Edward Ohl. The appellant was convicted of various offences including assault occasioning bodily harm, reckless grievous bodily harm and aggravated burglary. The appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by Justice Porter. The appellant did not succeed in his arguments that there was a miscarriage of justice due to errors in the trial judge’s directions to the jury and the length of his sentence.

The key legal issues in this case were whether the trial judge had erred in his directions to the jury, and whether the sentence imposed was excessive. The Court found that the trial judge's directions to the jury were correct and did not result in a miscarriage of justice. In relation to the sentence, the Court considered the seriousness of the offences and the appellant’s criminal history and found that the sentence was not excessive.

The Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence. The conviction and sentence of the appellant, Norman Edward Ohl, were upheld. No further orders were made.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.