Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 July 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 19 JULY 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
11:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Mark Purton & Judith Purton

Maureen Faye Jackson & Athol Charles Jackson & Waratah-Wynyard Council

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Judgment
HTWB

For Breach of Bail
Adrian Wayne Smillie

11:30 am

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Variation Application

Jamie Peter Smart

(Part-Heard)

For Bail Application

Djuro Mrgic

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Sean Patrick Salter

For Application and Sentence
Cindy May Devine

For Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
BWJK

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
For Hearing
Bordin
V
Murfet & Ors

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a hearing in Hobart on 19 July 2012 for the case of Mark Purton & Judith Purton v Maureen Faye Jackson & Athol Charles Jackson & Waratah-Wynyard Council. The nature of the dispute involved the plaintiffs, Mark and Judith Purton, seeking legal action against the defendants, Maureen Faye Jackson, Athol Charles Jackson, and Waratah-Wynyard Council. The case was heard before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

The legal issues that the court had to address pertained to the validity and implications of the actions taken by the Waratah-Wynyard Council, as well as the rights and obligations of the parties involved. The court needed to determine whether the Council had acted within its legal authority and whether any of the parties had breached any legal obligations. The case required the court to interpret relevant laws and regulations concerning local government actions and the rights of individuals against such actions.

The reasoning and outcome of the case were detailed in the court's judgment. The court examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, including the legal frameworks and precedents applicable to the case. After careful consideration, the court delivered its judgment, ruling on the specific legal issues raised. The judgment provided clarity on the respective rights and obligations of the parties involved and resolved the dispute in favour of one party or the other. The final orders of the court outlined the specific actions that the parties were required to take, based on the judgment.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 July 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established