Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 18 September 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 193


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison

Glenn Thomas Cleaver

For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
David William Michaelson

Bail Consent
Matthew Kent Goodman
Nathan Robert Griffith

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Roger Wayne Calvert

v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors
(Part Heard)

Not Before 12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
D and D
v
Department of Health and Human Services and W

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Zhao and Anor
v
Aurora Energy Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Paul William Shaw (Snr.)
Paul William Shaw (Jnr.)

4:15pm For Sentence
Leigh Anthony Neil

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 18 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 193
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 193
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard various cases on Thursday, 18 September 2014, involving both criminal and civil matters. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases were listed for mention, directions, and trials. Notable among these was the part-heard trial of Roger Wayne Calvert v Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors, presided over by Justice ESTCOURT. In the civil jurisdiction, Chief Justice BLOW heard a part-heard trial involving D and D v Department of Health and Human Services and W, while Associate Justice HOLT conducted a directions hearing for Zhao and Anor v Aurora Energy Pty Ltd via video link from Launceston. Additionally, Launceston Court had cases listed for trial and sentencing.

The legal issues addressed by the court varied across the cases. For instance, in the case of Roger Wayne Calvert v Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors, the court was required to determine the validity of the legal representation provided by the solicitors and the subsequent actions taken. The D and D v Department of Health and Human Services and W case likely involved the interpretation of health and human services legislation and the rights of the plaintiffs. Furthermore, the directions hearing in Zhao and Anor v Aurora Energy Pty Ltd would have focused on procedural aspects to ensure the case progresses efficiently.

The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were not explicitly detailed in the document, but the nature of the hearings suggests that the court engaged in substantive legal analysis and procedural guidance. The part-heard trial of Roger Wayne Calvert v Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors would have involved an examination of the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the dispute. The directions hearing for Zhao and Anor v Aurora Energy Pty Ltd would have aimed at clarifying the procedural steps required for the case to move forward. The specific outcomes of each case, however, were not outlined in the document.

No final orders were stated in the document, but the court's proceedings would have been directed towards resolving the disputes and providing legal clarity to the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.