SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison
Glenn Thomas Cleaver
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
David William Michaelson
Bail Consent
Matthew Kent Goodman
Nathan Robert Griffith
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Roger Wayne Calvert
v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors
(Part Heard)
Not Before 12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
D and D
v
Department of Health and Human Services and W
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Zhao and Anor
v
Aurora Energy Pty Ltd
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Paul William Shaw (Snr.)
Paul William Shaw (Jnr.)
4:15pm For Sentence
Leigh Anthony Neil
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 18 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 193
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 193
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues addressed by the court varied across the cases. For instance, in the case of Roger Wayne Calvert v Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors, the court was required to determine the validity of the legal representation provided by the solicitors and the subsequent actions taken. The D and D v Department of Health and Human Services and W case likely involved the interpretation of health and human services legislation and the rights of the plaintiffs. Furthermore, the directions hearing in Zhao and Anor v Aurora Energy Pty Ltd would have focused on procedural aspects to ensure the case progresses efficiently.
The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were not explicitly detailed in the document, but the nature of the hearings suggests that the court engaged in substantive legal analysis and procedural guidance. The part-heard trial of Roger Wayne Calvert v Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors would have involved an examination of the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the dispute. The directions hearing for Zhao and Anor v Aurora Energy Pty Ltd would have aimed at clarifying the procedural steps required for the case to move forward. The specific outcomes of each case, however, were not outlined in the document.
No final orders were stated in the document, but the court's proceedings would have been directed towards resolving the disputes and providing legal clarity to the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.