Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 17 December 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 17 DECEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Application to Dismiss Appeal
Nicholas David McWilliams
v
State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had a court session on Thursday, 17 December 2015, with cases scheduled in both criminal and civil jurisdictions. In Criminal Jurisdiction, Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, was set for an application to dismiss an appeal brought by Nicholas David McWilliams against the State of Tasmania. The case was presided over by Chief Justice Blow. In Civil Jurisdiction, Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, was scheduled for miscellaneous civil business at 9:15 a.m., conducted via video link to Launceston. No court sessions were scheduled for Launceston or Burnie.

The legal issue before the court in the criminal case was whether the appeal by Nicholas David McWilliams should be dismissed. The appeal was against a decision or outcome made by the State of Tasmania, and the court was tasked with determining the validity and merits of the appeal process and the grounds upon which the appeal was based. The court had to consider whether the appeal met the necessary legal criteria for being heard and whether there were any procedural or substantive reasons to dismiss it.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided extract. However, the court's decision on the application to dismiss the appeal would hinge on the specifics of the case, including the grounds of the appeal and any legal arguments presented by both parties. The court would consider the merits of the appeal, the procedural correctness of the appeal process, and any relevant statutory or common law principles that applied. The final outcome would depend on the court's determination of these factors.

No final orders were mentioned in the provided text, and any orders resulting from the court's decision would be communicated separately. The court's decision in this matter would be critical in determining the future course of the appeal and the legal relationship between Nicholas David McWilliams and the State of Tasmania.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 17 December 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established