Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 16 February 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 16 FEBRUARY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Kyle Alan Raymond Giffard

4:00 pm
For Sentence
Terence Lewis Martin

4:15 pm
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Christopher John Brown

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Kyle Ronald Street
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Anthony Troy Wright

4:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Daniel Robert Bradshaw

For Sentence
Bradan Sebastian James Stone

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Woodham
v
Roberts Limited

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.15am Trial (Part-Heard)
Kelly Douglas

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court

9:30 am
For Trial (part-heard)

JWT

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a range of criminal and civil matters were scheduled for various courts across the state. One notable criminal case involved Kyle Alan Raymond Giffard, who was set for trial in Hobart at 10:00 a.m. in Court 7. Another case involved Terence Lewis Martin, who was scheduled for sentencing at 4:15 p.m. in the same court. Additionally, a bail application was set for Christopher John Brown, to be heard in Court 8 by Justice TENNENT. In civil matters, Clarence City Council was engaged in a case against Darryl Robert Howlin and others, which was partially heard in Hobart before Justice EVANS. Meanwhile, in Launceston, a miscellaneous civil business case involving Woodham versus Roberts Limited was scheduled for a directions hearing before Associate Justice HOLT. These cases illustrate the breadth of legal matters handled by the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

The legal issues that the Supreme Court was required to decide in these cases ranged from the merits of criminal charges against individuals to the resolution of civil disputes between parties. In the criminal cases, the court needed to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused individuals based on the evidence presented. Sentencing decisions required the court to consider the appropriate punishment or rehabilitation measures for convicted individuals. In the civil case, the court had to resolve the claims and counterclaims between Clarence City Council and the defendants, potentially involving interpretations of contracts, statutory obligations, or other civil law principles.

Justice BLOW and Justice TENNENT, along with other justices, presided over the various hearings, applying relevant legal principles and statutes to reach decisions. The court's reasoning would have been based on the evidence presented, legal arguments made by the parties, and applicable case law. The outcomes of the cases would have varied based on the specific circumstances and the merits of each case. Orders made by the court would have included trial dates, sentencing, bail decisions, and directions for civil proceedings.

In the end, the court's decisions would have provided clarity and resolution to the legal issues presented, ensuring that justice was served in accordance with the law.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 16 February 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established