Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 16 April 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 16 APRIL 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Michael Douglas Starling
v
Philip Kerr
Michael Douglas Starling
v
Alisha Barnes

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Brodie John Self

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via Video Link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston

Justin Ryan Barnes

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence

Cameron James Riley

David John Hurd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence via Video Link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Justin Ryan Barnes

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Michael Douglas Starling versus Philip Kerr and Alisha Barnes was scheduled for hearing on 16 April 2015. The nature of the dispute between Starling and the defendants, Kerr and Barnes, is not specified in the court list but likely involves civil matters. The case was allocated to Court 7 in Hobart, presided over by Chief Justice Blow. The court list indicates that the hearing was to commence at 10:00 a.m.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide in this case pertain to the specific claims and defences presented by the parties. The nature of these issues could range from contract disputes, property matters, personal injury claims, or other civil litigation. The court would need to evaluate the evidence, apply relevant legal principles, and render a decision based on the facts and arguments presented. The outcome of the hearing would determine the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not provided in the court list. However, the decision would be based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and legal arguments presented during the hearing. The court would consider the applicable laws, precedents, and the specific circumstances of the case to arrive at a fair and just resolution. The final outcome would be communicated to the parties involved, and any necessary orders or judgments would be issued accordingly.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 16 April 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established