Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 13 June 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 13 JUNE 2013

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Michael John Spaulding
v
Colin Bertram Adams

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Application to Discharge Dangerous Criminal Declaration
Ian Robert Smith

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Sentence
Robert Francis Langford
Gary Robert Greig

10.00 a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Paul Fraser Catto

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
Submissions
Heyward
v
Moyle

2.15 p.m.
Injunction
Soil First Pty Ltd
v
Murdoch Clarke Mortgage Management Limited & Ors

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of cases on 13 June 2013, including civil and criminal matters. In Court 1, Michael John Spaulding was involved in a dispute with Colin Bertram Adams. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the text, but it was heard by the full court. In Court 7, Ian Robert Smith sought to discharge a declaration of dangerous criminal, and the matter was heard by Justice Porter. In Court 8, Robert Francis Langford and Gary Robert Greig were due to be sentenced, while in Court 3, Paul Fraser Catto made an application to vary bail. The court also heard civil matters, including an injunction application by Heyward against Moyle and a case involving Soil First Pty Ltd against Murdoch Clarke Mortgage Management Limited and others.

The legal issues before the court included the validity of a dangerous criminal declaration, the circumstances justifying the variation of bail, and the merits of an injunction application. The court was required to consider the evidence and arguments presented by the parties in each case and make a decision based on the law and facts. The court also had to consider the implications of its decisions for the parties involved and the broader community.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not specified in the text, but it is likely that the court considered the relevant legal principles and applied them to the facts of each case. The court may have made orders in favour of or against the parties, depending on the merits of their cases. The final orders would have been communicated to the parties and any interested parties in writing. Overall, the court's decisions would have been based on a careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented by the parties, and a rigorous application of the law.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 13 June 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established