Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 12 February 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 12 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Shadi Farhat

For Trial
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Peter Matthew Yost

For Trial
(Part-Heard)
FEP

For Sentence
Nicholas Aaron Paul Cernigoi

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd
v
Mark Richerdson

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae and Partners and Ors
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Thomson and Anor
v
Perkins and Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
JAW

2:00pm For Return on a Warrant
Clint Graeme Stanisz

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Mention
Jamie Laurence Carrick

For Trial
KA

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd as the plaintiff and Mark Richerdson as the defendant. The nature of the dispute was civil, focusing on matters of equity. The case was presided over by Justice Wood and was part of the civil jurisdiction, with the hearing taking place in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues before the court centred around the interpretation and application of equity principles within the context of the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant. The court was tasked with determining the rights and obligations of both parties in light of the specific circumstances presented in the case. This required a detailed examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both sides to arrive at a fair and just outcome.

Justice Wood, after considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, delivered a reasoned judgment. The court found in favour of the plaintiff, Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd, and made specific orders reflecting this decision. The judgment provided clarity on the application of equity principles in this context, offering guidance for similar cases in the future.

The final orders of the court included a determination of liability in favour of Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd, along with specific directives for the defendant to comply with the judgment. The precise terms of the orders, including any financial compensation or other remedies, were detailed in the court's written reasons. This decision serves as a precedent for understanding the application of equity in civil disputes within Tasmania.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 12 February 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established