Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 11 October 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 196


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Further Directions Hearing

Hamish John Wood

Nakita Renee Isabel Wright

Daniel Ross Jamieson

Anna-Lyce Maree Olding

Anthony Michael Blackaby

Eugene William Smith

Lewis Wayne Coles

Peta Louise Feil

For Mention via Video Link

Michael John Gardner

Nicholas Barry Wordsworth

Andrew Ian Devine

Rhys Louis Gardner

Bradley Scott Crosswell

Elizabeth Andrews

For Bail Variation Application

Joseph Andrew Edwards

For Plea

Damien Paul Haigh

Laurie Haigh

Renee Michelle Barker

Damien Thomas Bell

Lucas Gary Moore

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Trial

Anton Christofer Colev

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Murell Holdings Pty Ltd
v
Minister for Environment, Parks and Heritage

3.00 p.m.
Interrogatories
Castle
v
Legge

4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
State of Tasmania
v
Croft

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.30 a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Kathryn Anne Woodberry

10.00 a.m.
For Plea
SRM

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 11 October 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 196
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 196
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Thursday, 11 October 2012, to address various legal matters. Court 7, located at Salamanca Place in Hobart, presided over by Justice Evans, dealt with criminal cases and applications. Notably, there were several defendants scheduled for further directions hearings, mentions, and bail variation applications. Additionally, pleas were to be entered by certain defendants. Court 8, also in Hobart, presided over by Justice Wood, handled criminal trials and continued with a case that had been partially heard earlier.

The court was required to manage a diverse set of legal issues, ranging from determining the next steps in ongoing criminal cases to resolving bail variations and accepting pleas. The court also needed to hear and decide on civil matters, including interrogatories and directions hearings. The legal issues encompassed procedural aspects of criminal law, the conditions and terms of bail, and the management of ongoing trials.

Justice Evans and Justice Wood addressed these issues by scheduling and conducting the appropriate hearings and trials. The court efficiently managed its docket, ensuring that each matter received appropriate judicial attention. The outcomes of these hearings and trials would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented during the proceedings.

The final orders of the court would be documented in the respective case files, detailing the decisions made on each matter. The court's decisions would reflect its interpretation of the law and the evidence presented, ensuring that justice was served in each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.